17 comments

  • k310 9 minutes ago
    The most recently archived (meaning last) one seems to be 2020. 367 MB.

    https://archive.org/download/factbook-2020

  • jakzurr 31 minutes ago
    According to the wikipedia article,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Factbook

    this is the new open source site:

    https://openfactbook.org/

  • xnx 1 hour ago
    Title does not match page and title says "Facebook" instead of "Factbook".
    • walrus01 55 minutes ago
      CIA World Freudian Slip
  • nomilk 1 hour ago
    For those who aren't aware, the CIA World Factbook was a bit like a modern day atlas with many well-sourced headline statistics about each and every country. Things like it's political structure, religion, economy, population, history etc.

    I missed it recently when wanting to compare government revenue and expenditure for several countries. Without it, I didn't bother as I'd have to look figures up manually through each respective country's own budget website, and ensure figures were like-for-like (which they rarely are), and doing this for each country each with its own conventions is prohibitively tedious. Therein lies the value of Factbook; all that miserable distillation work was done for us.

    The rationale for defunding was 'why should the US tax-payer fund something that's equally valuable for everyone in the world'. I think that's fair. But I lament its removal and wish the US could rattle the tin so other countries chip in and bring it back.

    • walrus01 1 hour ago
      I never found it particularly useful but the CIA World Factbook seemed to have originated with some of the "country orientation guides" that the US DoD used to prepare in printed form for military service members being posted to weird locations. There's historical "Welcome to South Korea!" type documents that make an attempt to orient "never traveled outside of the USA before" type Americans to cultural and regionally specific things in Japan, South Korea, Germany, etc. The CIA World Factbook was just a more structured encylopedia like version of the same.

      edit: There was absolutely nothing "CIA" specific or sensitive about it whatsoever, it was basically like if you paid some government employees to attempt a job similar to the mid 1980s era Encylopedia Britannica. Maybe with a bit more emphasis on public statistics like literacy rate, percent of houses with telephones, economic statistics, other basic public stats that governments are known to publish.

    • somat 30 minutes ago
      I always figured the answer was that the information was for the US Taxpayer, and if other countries would like to use it. well, it is not for them, but if they can get access, fine, The effort required to try and keep them out is not worth it.

      Sort of the same reason US government works end up in the public domain "This work was funded by the US citizens and as such it is owned by the US citizens(in the public domain), it is too much hassle to try and prevent non-US citizens access so if they can get a copy they are free to use it as well"

      I liked the idea of having the intelligence agency maintain a public intelligence encyclopedia for it's citizens. Sort of how the geological survey provides public maps and earthquake alerts.

  • mindcrime 2 hours ago
    "CIA World Facebook"--> Is that a code name for PRISM or ECHELON or whatever??
    • klodolph 2 hours ago
      It was a literal factbook online. In high school, I remember using it to look up facts like the area or population of different countries.
      • cwnyth 1 hour ago
        The title of this submission says "Facebook", not "Factbook". That's what they were referring to.
      • lostlogin 1 hour ago
        I feel a bit twitchy remembering the pain of trying to do the references right for websites back then.
    • MrDrMcCoy 2 hours ago
      No, it was a guidebook anyone could use for just about every country. It well predates PRISM, and was well regarded until it was discontinued.
      • lmz 2 hours ago
        That was the factbook
        • marcelo-earth 1 hour ago
          I had to read it twice times. It has always been cited on Wikipedia for as long as I can remember.
    • nomilk 1 hour ago
      It's a typo in the HN title which should be corrected. Should be World Factbook; nothing to do with Facebook.
    • tty456 1 hour ago
      I thought it was a site exposing CIA undercover agents
    • ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago
      Freudian Slip. Everyone knows that Facebook is Five Eyes Book/Mossadbook
  • silverFork 1 hour ago
    Freedom In the world stat and couple of others - boundaries and value don't match; says 1-7 1 is the best but listed value is between 1 and 100
  • newman314 2 hours ago
    Request for higher contrast please for my old eyes.
    • decafbad 1 hour ago
      Pale-grey on white. There are many websites like this. Why on earth?

      darkreader.org helps.

      • PostOnce 38 minutes ago
        This is because Claude made them, and Claude doesn't have eyeballs.

        Low effort looks like low effort, even if you have an AI helping.

  • MrDrMcCoy 2 hours ago
    Feature request: include the source and date last updated for all information fields.
  • erikig 2 hours ago
    Thank you for including data sources as well as some basic data analysis. The scatter plots are quite helpful in analyzing some demographic assumptions that often arise when discussing economic and social development.

    You’ve earned yourself a bookmark :)

  • oofbey 2 hours ago
    What happened to the CIA world factbook? It was great.
    • serf 2 hours ago
      "On February 4, 2026, following the restriction and closure since 2025 of other government-funded information websites, the CIA announced, with no warning and no explanation, that The World Factbook was discontinued."[0]

      [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Factbook

      • JumpCrisscross 1 hour ago
        Do we have a credible source tying this to DOGE?
    • tejtm 2 hours ago
      It got spellchecked into the boards

      Maybe @dang can fix the autocorecto

  • walrus01 2 hours ago
    You know what else they killed? The SIGAR.mil website (special inspector general for afghan reconstruction), the congressionally chartered oversight/audit entity that had a very well laid out website with chronological ordered list of every document that the SIGAR had ever produced. But no, let's sweep it under the rug.

    All of its PDF are still out there in the public domain, just scattered and not well organized in a single set of tabular pages. Here's its final report for an example of what it did.

    https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/2145129/sigar-final-repor...

    • penskymaterial 1 hour ago
      [flagged]
      • JumpCrisscross 1 hour ago
        > Biden admin already had a plan in place to dissolve the agency months before the 2024 election even took place

        Source? (I know nothing about this, so I'm just trying to establish facts.)

        > This is what happens when you get your facts from Reddit

        Don't do this.

      • walrus01 1 hour ago
        I'm not even going to bother writing several long paragraphs lecturing you on the Trump administration plan to hand the country back to the Taliban, which was executed in early spring 2020 in the "Doha Peace Deal" during the peak of covid19, when the world news media was thoroughly distracted.

        For everyone else reading, the SIGAR reports cover a time span of multiple administrations, under both Bush terms, both Obama terms, Trump and then Biden again and second term of Trump. Its final report was published in late 2025. Removing all of its reference material on .AF generally is akin to removing the CIA World Factbook and is directly relevant to the topic at hand.

        The httpd that was the sigar.mil website was static content only and cost effectively nothing to keep up after its chartered mission was completed. Instead, it's been shut down under the current administration. Did you even see the SIGAR website before they killed it? It was dead simple.

        Your scant post history on what looks like a barely used sock puppet account also shows, and here's a verbatim quote: "All executions should be public if not for transparency's sake.", so I'm not going to further dignify engaging with some sort of fascist apologist.

        • penskymaterial 1 hour ago
          > I'm not even going to bother writing several long paragraphs

          Then why do you keep editing your post doing just that?

          > cost effectively nothing to keep up

          That's not how it works in any competently run business or public sector.

          > some sort of fascist apologist

          Nice personal attack, bruh.

          • walrus01 1 hour ago
            I have absolutely zero compunctions against engaging in a personal attack against someone who defends livestreaming a public execution. Have a nice day, guy.
  • Keyframe 1 hour ago
    The internet was so fucking great up until around the time facebook showed up and became overbearing. Starting with an era of 'multimedia' CD-ROMs and first wave of internet, through the second wave of internet around the dotcom era and the third era of "AJAX" it felt really open, accessible, full of everything.

    I can't tell for sure what happened around 2005 or so, youtube spawned up as well and it seemed for a while it was going great and then things started dying off, getting walled-in and dying within those walls as well.. I don't know how it happened, maybe as Hemingway put it - two ways. gradually, then suddenly.

    Factbook was one such place that carried memories of ye olde past.

    Also, CIA FACTbook, not CIA FACEbook, although when you think about it and In-Q-Tel lol.

  • TZubiri 1 hour ago
    *Factbook
  • ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago
  • k310 2 hours ago
    Factbook, please.
  • ulfw 2 hours ago
    Last thing I want is another Facebook
  • penskymaterial 2 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • alexgartrell 1 hour ago
      new account, obvious troll
    • dudeinjapan 2 hours ago
      CIA Factbook was mundane things like population, land area, system of govt, major exports, etc. Stuff that is now on the right-hand sidebar of Wikipedia. Presumably it was made for US govt employees to have a basic understanding of other countries. It was useful to do a 7th grade research report on Uzbekistan circa 1997.