jQuery 4.0.0 Released

(blog.jquery.com)

118 points | by OuterVale 2 hours ago

12 comments

  • blakewatson 1 hour ago
    Related: This is a nice write-up of how to write reactive jQuery. It's presented as an alternative to jQuery spaghetti code, in the context of being in a legacy codebase where you might not have access to newer frameworks.

    https://css-tricks.com/reactive-jquery-for-spaghetti-fied-le...

    • Klaster_1 51 minutes ago
      I used this approach before and it indeed works better than the 2010-style jQuery mess. A good fit for userscripts too, where the problem you attempt to solve is fairly limited and having dependencies, especially with a build steps, is a pain. Note that you don't need jQuery for this at all, unless you are somehow stuck with ancient browser support as a requirement - querySelector, addEventListener, innerHtml - the basic building blocks of the approach - have been available and stable for a long time.
      • doix 46 minutes ago
        Unfortunately, nowadays writing userscripts is much harder than it used to be. Most websites are using some sort of reactive FE framework so you need to make extensive use of mutationObservers (or whatever the equivalent is in jQuery I guess).
  • NetOpWibby 4 minutes ago
    I remember being scared of jQuery and then being scared of vanilla JS. My, how time flies.

    Incredible it's still being maintained.

  • b3ing 2 hours ago
    Nice to see it still around and updated. The sad part is I guess this means React will be around in 2060.
    • mikeaskew4 45 minutes ago
      by 2060 React Native should be up to v0.93
    • b65e8bee43c2ed0 1 hour ago
      there are already de facto two Reacts. by 2060, there will be five.
      • 2muchcoffeeman 1 hour ago
        Two Reacts!?
        • exac 1 hour ago
          As someone who doesn't use React, there is React Native (for iOS & Android), and React (and that can be server-rendered or client-rendered).
        • tcoff91 45 minutes ago
          class components & function components.
  • karim79 1 hour ago
    Still one of my favourite libs on the whole planet. I will always love jQuery. It is responsible for my career in (real) companies.

    Live on jQuery! Go forth and multiply!

  • rationably 2 hours ago
    Unbelievably, still supports IE 11 which is scheduled to be deprecated in jQuery 5.0
    • tartoran 1 hour ago
      Backwards compatibility. Apparently there are still some people stuck on IE11. It's nice that jQuery still supports those users and the products that they are still running.
      • phinnaeus 1 hour ago
        Are those people/products upgrading jQuery though?
      • jbullock35 1 hour ago
        Who is still stuck on IE 11---and why?
        • ddtaylor 1 hour ago
          I think anything still using ActiveX like stuff or "native" things. Sure, it should all be dead and gone, but some might not be and there is no path forward with any of that AFAIK.
        • ejmatta 1 hour ago
          Some corporate machines still run XP. Why upgrade what works?
  • jusonchan81 1 hour ago
    The first time I truly enjoyed web development was when I got the hang of jQuery. Made everything so much simple and usable!
    • Joel_Mckay 43 minutes ago
      jQuery made a messy ecosystem slightly less fragmented. Combined with CKEditor it effectively tamed a lot of web-developer chaos until nodejs dropped. =3
  • gocsjess 20 minutes ago
    jQuery is v4 now, but a lot of sites esp. wordpress still have 1.11 or 1.12 and only uses them to either doing modals(popover), show/hide(display), or ajax(fetch).
    • nchmy 4 minutes ago
      WordPress ships with 3.x and is already looking to update to 4
  • tpoacher 6 minutes ago
    still needs more jQuery
  • MarkdownConvert 1 hour ago
    Long-time user here. It served me well for years, though I haven't really touched it since the 3.0 days. Glad to see it's still being maintained.
  • tonijn 1 hour ago
    No love for $…?
  • netbioserror 1 hour ago
    I was surprised that for most of my smaller use cases, Zepto.js was a drop-in replacement that worked well. I do need to try the jQuery slim builds, I've never explored that.
    • NetOpWibby 1 minute ago
      Zepto! That's a name I haven't heard in years. I don't remember how it happened but I'm still a member of the ZeptoJS org on Github.
  • maxloh 1 hour ago
    Even after migrating to ES modules, jQuery is still somewhat bloated. It is 27 kB (minified + gzipped) [0]. In comparison, Preact is only 4.7 kB [1].

    [0]: https://bundlephobia.com/package/jquery@4.0.0

    [1]: https://bundlephobia.com/package/preact@10.28.2

    • onion2k 1 hour ago
      jQuery does a lot more though, and includes support older browsers.